Should Google’s new voice search update impact search optimisation?

And if so, what steps should you take?

By 

published on 

Google has announced an update to voice search that uses AI to make it faster and more accurate. This Speech-to-Retrieval (S2R) model is a major change in how spoken queries are processed. I wanted to unpick whether it has a knock-on effect for SEO too.

Traditionally, when users spoke into their devices, Google’s system first converted speech into text using Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), and then ran a text-based search query. The S2R model removes that middle step. Instead of transcribing what you say, Google’s AI directly interprets the meaning of your voice input and maps it to the most relevant results.

This shift from ‘speech-to-text-to-search’ to ‘speech-to-meaning-to-search’ has been designed to improve both speed and accuracy. By skipping transcription, S2R reduces errors and better captures intent, even when users speak casually, mispronounce words, or use vague phrasing. According to Google, it marks the beginning of a new phase of semantic voice retrieval – one focused on understanding what users mean, not just what they say.

For marketers, SEOs, and content creators, this shift could be interesting (I’ll explain my caveat later on!) as it may alter how voice-based queries are interpreted, how search rankings are calculated, and ultimately, how content should be structured to remain discoverable. 

1. From keywords to intent

S2R transforms queries into vectors (numbers) that represent the semantic meaning of what the person is asking for. It does the same for the potential results and tries to match them up. This all means that content that focuses solely on exact keywords may not be as successful in voice results as it was in traditional SERPS. Instead, Google’s AI will look for conceptual alignment: how well your content captures the intent or topic behind the query.

For example, a spoken query like “what’s that painting with the screaming guy?” no longer depends on keyword overlap with “The Scream by Edvard Munch.” The system recognises the meaning and retrieves relevant results even if the exact words differ.

So what does this mean for optimisation?

Comprehensive content written in natural language is likely to perform better than short, keyword-stuffed pieces. That was the case anyway but now there is an additional need to make sure content is written for real people and not search engines. 

2. Conversational content

As people are intrinsically time poor and/or lazy, we tend to type as few words as possible for text search – “ISA rules UK”, or “car tax 2005 audi” whereas for a voice search we’re much more likely to say, “What are the ISA rules in the UK?” or “How much is car tax on a 2005 audi?”

S2R however thrives on understanding these idiosyncrasies of natural language. As users become more comfortable speaking to devices conversationally, the model will interpret context and intent, not just direct requests. So if a user is particularly talkative, it will still be able to pick out their need, even in longer chattier sentences.

So what does this mean for optimisation?

It may be helpful to adopt a conversation-first approach. This means anticipating how users might phrase questions aloud, using complete sentences and everyday language. Incorporate FAQs, dialogue-style headings, and contextual cues (“open now,” “near me,” “for kids”) into your content.

Structured data like schema markup can also help Google connect your content to spoken intent – for example, marking up opening hours, locations, or reviews so the voice system can instantly retrieve them.

3. Broader search diversity

Because S2R searches by meaning rather than literal phrasing, Google may return a broader set of relevant results. A single voice query could map to multiple interpretations or related intents.

So what does this mean for optimisation?

Instead of chasing one keyword, optimise for clusters of intent. Build topic hubs that cover a theme really comprehensively – including related subtopics, definitions, case studies, and FAQs. One blog post may not cut it for voice search – even if it was fantastically optimised for text search.

4. Focus on user experience and speed

Since S2R improves response time, users will expect instant, natural interactions. Voice queries often seek quick answers, so Google will favour content that delivers clarity immediately.

So what does this mean for optimisation?

Prioritise concise, clear summaries – especially in the opening paragraphs or featured snippets. Use headings, bullet points, and direct answers that Google might arise via voice search. Combine this with fast-loading, mobile-optimised pages to meet user expectations.

5. Preparing for multimodal search

S2R also sets the foundation for multimodal voice + visual search, where users can speak while pointing their camera at an object or location. This will blend voice SEO with visual and local optimisation.

So what does this mean for optimisation?

Include high-quality images, and for those images include a relevant and hyphen-separated file name, alt text, captions, and descriptive surrounding text. For local businesses, ensure your Google Business Profile is complete and up-to-date, including photos of the exterior of the business, to match real-world “near me” voice queries.

Now for the caveat

A lot of the above isn’t new. We at Browser Media could rightly be accused of always banging the same drum: “Optimise for people not search engines!” 

Following this mantra would mean that, in most cases, you should perform well for voice search too. If your content is very keyword-rich, doesn’t read well or is a bit heavy going for your audience, you could, however, be out of favour in the world of voice search. 

It’s also worth giving a moment’s thought to whether your target audience is likely to use voice search. This could be on a number of fronts – are they in a demographic that is comfortable speaking into a phone? And does the product or service you’re selling lend itself to voice search?

Voice search is important and while someone may be happy with a restaurant recommendation via voice search, would they do the same for in-depth, research-based activities like planning a holiday or choosing a divorce solicitor? I’d argue, not.  

Conclusion

Google’s S2R model is clever. It fundamentally changes how voice search understands and retrieves content. Instead of focusing on exact words, it recognises meaning and intent – a shift that rewards content built for humans rather than algorithms. 

For SEO professionals, this means a move away from keyword-based tactics towards more semantic, conversational, and context-rich optimisation (if they weren’t doing that already!)

Enjoy this post?

Sign up to Browser Media Bytes for similar posts straight to your inbox.

BM Bytes Sign Up